Awareness and Attitude of Medicine Consumers towards ADR Reporting: A Questionnaire based study of Rural Chhattisgarh
Tabish Ahmed1*, S. B. Kaikade2
1Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BRLSABVM GMC Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
2Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Dr. N Y Tasgaonkar Institute of Medical Sciences,
Karjat, Maharashtra.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: dr.tabishahmed@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The National Pharmacovigilance Programme is coordinated by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission at Ghaziabad. The Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) is now in full swing. We have a network of some 90 adverse drug reaction (ADR) Monitoring Centres (AMCs) across the country. The programme provides financial, logistic and technical support to the AMCs. Initially, only health professionals could report the ADR. Recently PvPI has included all people who consume medicine and not just health professionals, to report ADR. A toll free consumer helpline (1800 180 3024 operational on weekdays during office hours) and a dedicated email address (PvPI.compat@gmail.com) have been launched to encourage people to report ADRs. Aim and objectives: To study awareness and attitude of medicine consumers towards ADR reporting Materials and methods: This is a questionnaire based study where consumers will be given the questionnaire regarding ADRs and their reporting. Study plan: Time duration - 3months. Discussion: It is important to spread awareness and importance about ADR reporting amongst the general population.
KEYWORDS: ADR, Pharmacovigilance, consumers, knowledge.
INTRODUCTION:
A negative effect following an ingestion of a drug is referred to as Adverse drug Event (ADE) also as defined by WHO as' any untoward medical occurrence that may present during treatment with a medicine, but which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment.1 Adverse drug reactions (ADRS) are an important source of morbidity and mortality which accounts for approximately 5.3% of hospital admissions2,3. The incidence of fatal ADR ranges 0.23% - 0.41%.4
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which: results in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, may have caused a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage.3
Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problems.5
Many countries have recognized the importance of pharmacovigilance and have joined the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.6 In India on July 2010, the Government of India initiated the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) with AIIMS, New Delhi and NCC for monitoring ADRs in the country for safeguarding public health by assuring the safety of medicinal products.7
Traditionally only health care professionals (HCPs) report ADRs to the national pharmacovigilance system but the consumers also have the rights to report ADR of the drug consumed.8 According to the review article9. Consumer reporting has some advantages like directness, proper estimation of the burden of ADRs for individuals, early detection of ADRs, ADR reporting of over the counter medicines and promotion of consumer rights. Knowing importance of consumer reporting, direct patient reporting systems exist in many countries from decades.10 National Coordination Centre(NCC)-PvPI has also launched “Medicines Side Effect Reporting form for Consumers” in 2014.11 Patient or his/her representative(relative) are encouraged to report ADRs either directly to the NCC-PvPI through toll free helpline number or an email id or to their nearest AMC under PvPI by submitting the blue form. However, annual performance report of PvPI 2014-2015 suggests that consumer reporting is as low as low as 0.08% in India.11 Annual performance report 2014-15 of PvPI showed only 27 consumer reports out of 34, 988 ADR reports submitted to Vigi Base.
Reasons for under reporting of ADRs:
1. Lack of knowledge on how, what, and where to report
2. Lack of time
3. The drug-reaction association is uncertain
4. The reaction is already well known
5. Guilt or fear of litigation
6. Belief that all registered medicines are safe
7. Non-availability of reporting forms
8. Problems with establishing reporting systems in hospitals
9. Insufficient training to recognise ADRs12
This study is centered on the remarkably low level of consumer ADR reporting in India. Knowledge and attitude about ADR reporting among consumers are one of the most important determinants of consumer ADR reporting. Observation of ADR reporting practice can be useful in exploring the probable causes of under reporting as well as preferred method of ADR reporting amongst consumers. Hence, the present study was designed to evaluate knowledge, attitude and practice regarding ADR reporting among consumers.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about ADR reporting in patients coming to the tertiary care teaching hospital
2. To sensitize the patients about ADR reporting
METHODS:
This cross sectional, Observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital of rural Chhattisgarh. A investigator administered questionnaire was given to the patients coming to outdoor patient departments of Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Dermatology.
The study was carried over for 3 months from January 2023 to March 2023. The questionnaire was available in both English and Hindi. A total of 100 consumers (Patients) were included in the study.
The questionnaire also gathered personal information like their age, sex, education, employment status, presence of any addiction, also origin like urban or rural.
The results were tabulated and analyzed on an excel sheet.
RESULTS:
In our study out of 100 respondents 68 were females and 32 were males. Maximum (48%) of the respondents were from the age group of 20-40 years. 64% of the respondents were from rural background. 53% of consumers had education upto 10th standard, 26% were educated till 12th and 18% were graduates and remaining 3% were illiterate. The employment status was working 55% and nonworking 45%. (Table-1)
Table-1 Demographic characteristics of the respondents
|
Characteristic |
Range |
Percentage |
|
Age |
Less than 20yrs 20-40yrs 40-60 yrs Above 60yrs |
17 48 25 10 |
|
Sex |
Males Females |
32 68 |
|
Education |
Illiterate Upto 10th Upto 12th Graduates |
3 53 26 18 |
|
Origin |
Rural Urban |
64 36 |
|
Working status |
Unemployed Employed |
55 45 |
As regards to knowledge regarding ADR 38% knew that medicines had the potential to cause unwanted effects. Figure-1.
Figure-1 Knowledge regarding ADR caused by medicines
Figure-2 Region specific response of consumers about ADR
This knowledge was better in urban population (78%) as compared to rural (22%). Figure-2
As far as experience of adverse effects (16%) indicated that they had encountered them, 58% never experienced adverse effects, whereas 28% were uncertain whether they experienced or not. Commonly encountered ADRS as skin rashes (45%), GIT disturbances-Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea (34%), fever (12%), weight loss (7%), weight gain (1%), others like dryness of mouth (2%).
Majority of them (38%) did not do anything on experiencing ADR, only 25% reported it to the doctor and took treatment. 88% approved that ADR should be reported. None of them think that consumers should report ADR, maximum feel its responsibility of doctor to report ADR(58%). On relating to the question that consumers should be taught how to report ADR, majority (73%) agreed. 28% knew about the system of ADR reporting. As a final call of awakening 58% promised to report ADR themselves.
DISCUSSION:
Medicines play a vital role in our lives. If they have beneficial effects and at the same time they have adverse effects. The pharmacovigilance programme of India (PvPI) was initiated by the government of India for monitoring ADRs in the country for safeguarding public health. Most of the studies had explored the knowledge and perception about ADR reporting amongst healthcare providers, nurses, pharmacist and medical students as study population but on patients studies are limited.13,14,15
Consumers are the end users of pharmaceutical products, to ensure the safe use of them is the ultimate goal of pharmacovigilance activities. Its very important to improve consumer reporting in India. A total 100 patients from various OPDs like Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Dermatology were included in the study. ADR reporting by consumers is found to be quite low in India. Many people who consume medicines do not have a proper understanding of ADRs as shown by other studies.16,17. Only 38% knew that medicines could cause ADR. This low level of awareness can be improved by measures like conducting awareness programmes and campaigns as suggested by the study conducted about ADR at Beaumont hospital in Ireland.17
Table-2 Attitude and Practice of consumers on occurrence of ADR
|
Questions |
Opinion |
Percentage of responses |
|
Did you experience ADR? |
Yes No Can’t say |
16 58 28 |
|
Common ADRs encountered after taking medicines |
GIT disturbances-Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea Skin rashes Fever Weight loss Weight gain Others |
34 45 12 07 01 02 |
|
What did you do after experiencing ADRs?
|
Nothing Stopped taking medicines Took another medicines on own Reported to the doctor and took treatment Reported to the pharmacist and took treatment |
38 09 18 25 10 |
|
Do you think ADRs should be reported? |
Yes No |
88 12 |
|
Who is the right person to report about ADR? |
Doctor Pharmacist Nurse Consumer Drug manufacturing company |
59 15 21 00 05 |
|
Do you think consumers should be involved in ADR reporting? |
Yes No |
85 15 |
|
Should consumers be taught how to report ADR? |
Yes No |
73 27 |
|
Will you report ADR? |
Yes No |
58 42 |
Poorer knowledge about ADRs is found more in consumers of rural background as 53% of participants were educated till 10th standard as similarly justified by other studies.18
38% consumers who experienced ADR didn't report it by any method. The common reasons for underreporting is lack of knowledge that side effects were medicine related and also the belief that the side effect would resolve on its own. Skin rashes were the most common experienced ADR (45%).Here counseling plays a major role in improving understanding and reporting of ADR.
88% of people believe that the ADR should be reported which depicts that if proper knowledge is given underreporting would decrease.
59% of them reported the ADR to the doctor, none of them used a consumer reporting programme which correlates with a deficit in awareness about the programme in public. In Spite of the fact that the consumer ADR reporting was launched in 2014, knowledge regarding reporting is still low.
Consumers should be encouraged to fill ADR as it’s available since 2014 and those reports should be addressed via mail to pvpi@ipcindia.net or pvpi.ipcindia@gmail.com or can call helpline 1800-180-3024 to report ADR. This is also mentioned in similar study.16
While educating the patients it should be kept in mind that awareness of ADR so that they can recognise any unusual effect of medicine is important along with contacting the doctor for the same.Also existence and importance of ADR reporting system.
CONCLUSION:
ADRs are one of the important factors which can cause death or debilitating conditions, also it increases length of hospitalization, number of drugs causing financial as well as emotional burden.So proper detection, assessment, monitoring and management on time are also important steps along with reporting of ADR.The general population needs to be should be time to time educated regarding possible ADRs and its reporting in hospitals and pharmacy whenever they are prescribed medicines. Also use of audio visual aids along with use of social media can be encouraged. Also the health care providers should be updated about possible adverse effects by means of workshops, conferences and training sessions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None.
REFERENCES:
1. Preeti S, Manju A, Rajesh Hr et al. Adverse drug reactions at adverse drug reaction monitoring center in Raipur:Analysis of spontaneous reports for 1 year. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2017.
2. Shepherd G, Mohorn P, Yacoub K, May DW. Adverse drug reaction deaths reported in United States vital statistics, 1999-2006. Ann Pharmacother. 2012; 46(2): 169-75
3. Kongkaew C, Noyce PR, Ashcroft DM. Hospital admissions associated with adverse drug reactions:a systematic review of prospective observational studies. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42(7): 1017-25
4. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients:a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998; 279(15): 1200-5
5. World Health Organization. Medicines safety, 2017.Available at http://www.who.int/medicines/regulation/medicines-safety/en/(Accessed on 1 October 2017).
6. WHO collaborating centre for International Drug Monitoring; 2018. Available at:http://www.who-umc.org/global-pharmacovigilance/ who-programme/.Accessed on 10 July 2018.
7. Singh GN, Gupta SK et al. Guidance Document for Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Version:1.0.Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission National Coordination Centre-Pharmacovigilance Programme of India Ministry of Health and family welfare Government of India.12 May 2014.
8. Kalaivani M, Kalaiselvan V, Dabhi K, Singh GN. Direct consumer reporting of ADRs to PVPI, a position paper of Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission .Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2015; 4(184): 2167-1052
9. Mukherjee S, Sen S, Kalaisevan V, Tripathi S.Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions:A current perspective. Intern J Green Pharmacy. 2016; 10(3): 136-42
10. Medawar C, Herxheimer A.A comparison of adverse drug reaction reports from professionals and users, relating to risk of dependence and surgical behaviour with paroxetine.Intern J Risk & Safety in Med. 2003; 16(5): 19
11. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, 2017.Available at:http://ipc.gov.in. (Accessed on 11 October 2017)
12. Catherine P, Christian L, Sefarina C, et al, Limitations and obstacles of the spontaneous adverse drugs reactions reporting: Two “challenging” case reports. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2013; 4(1): 66-72
13. Gupta SK, Nayak RP, Shivrajani R, Vidhyarthi SK.A questionnaire study on knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance among the healthcare professionals in a teaching hospital in southern India. Perspect. Clin Res. 2015; 6(1): 45-52
14. Jha N, Ratthore DS, Shankar PR, Gywali S. Pharmacovigilance knowledge among patients in teaching hospital in Lalitpur district, Nepal.J Clin Diag Res 2014; 8(3):32-4
15. Rehan HS, Vasudev K, Tripathi CD. Adverse drug reaction monitoring: Knowledge, attitude and practices of medical students and prescribers. Natl India. 2002; 15: 24-6
16. Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions:a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 63: 148-56.
17. Van Hunsel F, Passier A, Van Groothest K.Comparing patients and healthcare professionals ADR reports after media attention:the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 67: 558-64.
18. Pahuja R, Shrivastava B, Sharma P, Kishore K, Mahajan S, Sood R. Awareness on Adverse Drug reaction Reporting System in India:A consumer Survey. American J Phytomedicine and Clin Therap. 2014; 2(12): 1361-9.
Received on 20.10.2023 Modified on 15.11.2023
Accepted on 02.12.2023 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2024;16(1):58-61.
DOI: 10.52711/2321-5836.2024.00011